As a Suzuki teacher, I’ve committed myself to the philosophy that every child is capable of developing incredible talent. If I believe that every child can, should I be taking on every family inquiring about lessons?
Does being selective about which families I take on make me a bad Suzuki teacher?
Carrie Reuning-Hummel, director of Ithaca Talent Education (ITE) and Suzuki teacher for over 40 years, doesn’t think so. In our classes, Carrie has emphasized the importances of selectively taking on families who are primed to learn — who are ready for the commitment. In order to find out if a family is ready, Carrie will invite a family to what most from the outside would call a ‘trial lesson’ or an ‘interview.’
In this ‘trial’ lesson she is assessing the age and maturity of the child and the parent. She wants to know what their ability is to respond, to fundamentally change, to grow.
Inexperience with music, delayed dexterity, shyness, or the label of a learning disability might deter other teachers, but we know from Suzuki’s example that these are all challenges unique to students that can be overcome with skillful teaching, a robust environment, and careful practice. However if a family is not ready to listen, ready to change, or ready to learn together, then they are not yet ready for violin lessons.
This does not mean a family or student will never take lessons, just that they aren’t ready to start at this time.
But how do you assess a readiness to learn in a three year old? While observing at ITE on a recent Friday I saw Carrie teach a ‘trial lesson’ in real time. In person I saw her lead assessment activities — invaluable activities I will borrow when meeting a child for the first time — which were framed within a careful getting-to-know-each-other process.
Here is how it unfolded… [Read more…]