I’ve used the following language around ‘elements’ and their ‘extensions’ to help me develop practice strategies, communicate with parents about practice, and spice up group classes. I don’t believe any other Suzuki teachers use the word ‘element,’ I’m just borrowing it from the permaculture community.
I define an element in the violin worlds as a graspable, practicable unit. Any piece would fall under this category. As would a scale or etude or game. A general concept, such as vibrato would not. If the concept of vibrato were distilled into a useful exercise, such as peg knocks, string polishing, or oscillations with a recording, then it would be become an element.
If you assign ‘tone’ to your student, it’s likely they won’t know how to practice it– how to manifest tone. They will even have a subtle resistance against practicing tone because the work of sorting vague technique into a coherent set of things to DO is effortful.
Ask students to play Dr. Suzuki’s tonalization, and suddenly the effort of tone practice is only the effort of producing great tone. Not figuring out what to play.
The other beautiful aspect of an element, versus a vague concept, is that it can be manipulated and twisted and grafted and painted a different color while retaining its structure. I call this transmutation ‘extension.’
Challenge, creativity, and fun go hand in hand. Extension is what brings challenge and creativity into the lesson. [Read more…]